What should we expect when Ronda Rousey and Gina Carano bring MMA to Netflix in May? How is Paramount feeling about the UFC partnership after Sean Strickland’s latest rant? And is the solution for heavyweights as simple as not asking them to fight three full rounds?
All that and more in this week’s mailbag. To ask a question of your own, hit up @BenFowlkesMMA on X or @Ben_Fowlkes on Threads.
@ewillcock: In Carano vs Rousey, I expect people will tune in, not to see who wins, but to see what happens.
I think I’m one of those people, and I’m excited at the potential for an exciting under card. Is there anything else to see here?
I expect there will be a lot of people who tune in based on two main factors: 1) They already have a Netflix subscription, and 2) They have at least heard of Ronda Rousey and/or Gina Carano. That’s enough right there. The fact that we might see something weird or memorable or just big and loud and dumb? That’s icing on the cake.
Advertisement
I don’t expect this to be all that competitive of a fight. I don’t think it would have been competitive even if they were both still in their respective primes. Rousey is the better fighter, the better athlete, and the far superior finisher.
She’s also probably a lot closer to something resembling fighting shape. Rousey herself suggested as much when she said one of the reasons she wanted to fight Carano was because she’d seen a recent interview in which Carano appeared to have gained a lot of weight. This fight, Rousey said, might give her a goal to work toward and a reason to get herself back in shape. (Side note: If any of you ever decide to help me solely because you see me and think I look really bad, feel free to keep that part to yourself.)
As for the undercard, I think we’ll probably see some familiar names long past their expiration dates as top fighters. There are at least a few fun fights that could be made from the available pool. But other than that? The UFC has most of the relevant talent locked up, and PFL has the rest. Who else would you even get other than known old-timers or totally unknown youngsters?
@Beastin364: Sean Strickland is back at it. Do you think Paramount regrets getting into business with the UFC when they see stuff or like that or did they know this ws part of the deal
They had to know. Right? I don’t see how any major company does any deal with the UFC and there’s not at least one conversation about the UFC’s, shall we say, permissive policies on fighter speech. It doesn’t take a crystal ball to know that, sooner or later, your communications department is going to be asked for a comment on the latest nonsense some UFC fighter uttered into a microphone on purpose. It also doesn’t take a fortune teller to guess that the fighter most likely to be the source of this specific variety of headache is Sean Strickland.
Advertisement
Am I the only one who sees this as a desperate grasp for relevance by him? This is his gimmick, and it has mostly stopped working. If he wants to keep getting attention for it, he has to keep ratcheting it up. Casual racism isn’t bringing the likes and the views anymore? Toss a few slurs in there. Take some shots at women while you’re at it. Maybe demeaning half the world’s population will result in another hit of attention.
At this point, it’s like he’s a kid jumping up and down and shouting for us to please, please look at him. Meanwhile, he’s a +220 underdog at BetMGM in a fight with one of the division’s rising contenders. This is a man on the brink. He wants to stay in the headlines and, with mixed results inside the cage lately, he only knows one reliable way to do it.
@KneebarNewsMMA: We shouldn’t expect heavyweights and bantamweights to have equal cardio. Why not reduce the cage time for heavyweight fights, perhaps to three 3-minute rounds?
I say we go the other direction. Everyone knows that the best heavyweight fights are the ones that end quickly and violently, usually in the first round. So why not see what we can do to discourage any of the big guys from even thinking about a second or third round?
Advertisement
I say bring back the 10-minute first round, but only for heavyweights. Let them know that they can either go out there and try to get it done quick or else become completely exhausted before they even get a chance to see the stool. You know these guys don’t want to fight for 10 minutes. They’ll see that and be motivated to take some chances and get out of there early. If somehow we get a Round 2? Then I’m fully in support of giving the referee permission to end any heavyweight fight at any time and declare it a draw if he concludes that no one needs to see these guys lean on each other any longer.
@VoiceofGarcia: Would you say the pressure on Dana and Paramount is added more to make the “best” White House card, thanks to MVP’s announcement of Rousey vs Carano?
If they weren’t already feeling that pressure, they should have been. This White House event has been talked about to death already, and we’re still four months away, so it really has to deliver in order to feel like anything other than a letdown. The fact that Rousey and Carano will fight a month prior might turn the screws a little bit, but I’d hope Dana White and the UFC have enough awareness to see they’ve created a monster here already, and monstrous expectations will come with it.
@SLedkaditis: An undeserved Interim title fight, a rematch no one wanted and a BMF fight.
What’s the UFC’s title landscape going into the White House event?
The good news about having so few titles up for grabs in the months before this June event is that it ought to leave a lot to choose from.
Advertisement
I think a lightweight title fight between Ilia Topuria and Justin Gaethje is an easy choice. Heavyweight (unless it’s an interim belt) is probably off the table, just based on how Tom Aspinall’s recovery is going. At light heavyweight, Alex Pereira would be a great choice to lend some star power. At middleweight, I don’t know if it would be a great look to have a Chechen warlord’s favorite fighter defending his title at the White House right now.
The other big one I think we could reasonably hope for is Kayla Harrison vs. Amanda Nunes. It would be a tight turnaround after neck surgery for Harrison, but I think she’s motivated to get back in time to fight on this card.
@OnAirMafia: Part 1 – with the talk late last year about Eddie Hearn maybe getting into MMA with Turki and his recent collab with MVP in the Joshua/Paul fight…what are the odds about them all hooking up in this possible MVP MMA venture to try to challenge Dana & UFC?
There’s no serious chance for anyone to challenge the UFC in a real way. Not right now. It has almost all the top fighters under contract. It’s constantly funneling developing talent through the Contender Series and onto the main roster (at budget prices). The brand name is the sport in the mind of the public. There’s just no current way to create a new MMA competitor and keep it going in any way that would threaten the UFC at all.
Advertisement
What there might be room for is a hybrid fight promotion, something with boxing and MMA — plus maybe even kickboxing and bare-knuckle — all on the same fight card. That comes with challenges of its own, but at least it would offer some flexibility. It might also be just novel and weird enough to sustain our attention.
@ihab23: Why are we pretending UFC White House is a celebration of America when it’s really a birthday party for our dear leader? They blatantly changed the date from July 4 to Trump’s birthday.
Are we pretending that? I think we all know what this is going to be. The UFC has gone all-in for Trump and been rewarded for it. It’s definitely driven some fans away, but I also doubt the UFC would have gotten $1.1 billion from Paramount if it hadn’t positioned itself this way. There’s simply no way this broadcast doesn’t shower attention and praise on Trump at every opportunity. If he’s not awarded some kind of honorary gold belt at some point, I’ll be shocked. Some fans will probably love that and others will hold their noses through it, but we should all be prepared for it.
@LCombatsports: Am I wrong to think what could happen if the revival act passes is TKO spends money getting top or up and coming boxers, athletes & fans gravitate to Zuffa Boxing, the industry centralizes around them, & jobs are lost because companies arent interested in boxing unless it’s TKO?
That’s looking way down the road. TKO is pretty far from anything resembling a boxing takeover right now. Its goal for now seems to be a weekly fight-night type of offering, populated mostly by boxers who are still far from the elite level. I can see that being profitable for TKO, but it’s nowhere close to being able to put on the big boxing events just yet. Which isn’t to say that couldn’t change. It just won’t change quickly.
