The fatality rate for cycling is disproportionately high – but the health risks of letting cars do all the work are far greater

by November 19, 2024

written by November 19, 2024

The fatality rate for cycling is disproportionately high – but the health risks of letting cars do all the work are far greater

Adam Becket

News editor at Cycling Weekly, Adam brings his weekly opinion on the goings on at the upper echelons of our sport. This piece is part of The Leadout, a newsletter series from Cycling Weekly and Cyclingnews. To get this in your inbox, subscribe here. As ever, email adam.becket@futurenet.com – should you wish to add anything, or suggest a topic.

It’s road safety week in the UK, a time to think about how roads could be safer across the country (and, the world), particularly for those more vulnerable. It’s all too easy to feel vulnerable as a cyclist, as a person wearing regular clothes or lycra, pedalling along while two-tonne vehicles rush past you. But, we must also remember that, by choosing cycling over more sedentary modes of transport, we’re reducing our risk of far more prevalent threats on a daily basis.

“Every year, more than 100 cyclists die on UK roads, meaning they make up around 6% of all road deaths”, reports road safety charity Brake. “The fatality rate is disproportionately high – on average, 30 cyclists die for every billion miles travelled, compared with just two car drivers.” This makes for sombre reading and doesn’t even take into account the injuries, serious or minor, that are reported in their thousands every year. Just this week, we will be publishing the accounts of two people seriously injured by the actions of drivers, as a reminder of the reality that we encounter on two wheels in this country.

Cycling is a cure to so many of the issues that we face, both as a collective and individually. It is still better for you to cycle than to drive, both from a personal and public health perspective. Compared to commuting by car, cycling is associated with a lower chance of dying from cardiovascular disease – a quarter less – and cancer, according to Cycling UK, while the life years gained by cycling outweighed life years lost by 20:1, according to a study from the 1990s, although that is likely to have risen since then, the charity says. The benefits of cycling are so great, that it’s been prescribed as a legitimate ‘medication’ by GPs working for the UK’s National Health Service.

Cycling is much better for our environment, crucial in this age of the climate crisis – in which a 2018 study revealed that pollution from cars and vans was costs £6billion per year in health damages. Like all active travel, cycling creates a feeling of community, too, where people are no longer shut off inside their vehicles. It’s also cheaper than driving, which is worth remembering as many of us feel the squeeze.

People don’t want to cycle if they have to share the road with vans, lorries, and whatever else is allowed on the road, they want to be able to cycle without fear. Liveable streets have been turned into a culture wars issue, with people unable to see a future with less car use, but what the idea represents is a community where you can get around in a low traffic environment, one which allows for people of all ages and abilities to walk, cycle or scoot.

Source link

The fatality rate for cycling is disproportionately high – but the health risks of letting cars do all the work are far greater

Picking Premier League teams using only squad numbers 1-11

England vs. Japan: Immanuel Feyi-Waboso out; Tom Curry back

You may also like