Home US SportsNCAAF Brendan Sorsby’s $1M Dispute to Decide Future of NIL Contracts in College Football: Report

Brendan Sorsby’s $1M Dispute to Decide Future of NIL Contracts in College Football: Report

by

NIL drama keeps getting testier for the NCAA every day. The legal showdown between Brendan Sorsby and the Cincinnati Bearcats has grown into a fight big enough to potentially change NIL’s future in collegiate sports. But it will ruin everything that the NCAA has strived for with regard to NIL through all these years.

Sorsby filed a Motion to Dismiss in court and asked Judge Michael Barrett in response to Cincinnati’s demand for $1 million in liquidated damages. The Bearcats lost the quarterback to Texas Tech via the portal this year in the middle of his two-season contract. That prompted Cincinnati to sue Sorsby for breaking the terms. But this case is one of the first real legal tests of these types of NIL agreements, especially after the House Settlement allowed schools to share revenue with players.

Advertisement

The now Red-Raiders QB argued that Cincinnati’s ‘NIL contract’ was just a guise, and that the money he got from Cincinnati as NIL was really payment for playing football. Sorsby said he was already paid $875,000 by his former program for these services. But since colleges ‘paying’ student-athletes would make them employees, Cincinnati treated the money as NIL. The QB also asserted that “in reality,” his “NIL rights have very little monetary value.” The contract only gave value to his NIL because it was “the only way the NCAA allows Cincinnati to pay him “for playing football.

After the House v. NCAA settlement in June 2025, schools were allowed to share up to $20.5 million per year directly with players. Still, this would still be termed as an ‘NIL payment.’ The NCAA has been trying to seek federal intervention to prevent student-athletes from acquiring the ’employed’ term. This would complicate the whole landscape in college sports, because labor laws will enter the fold. The SCORE Act, which tackled this problem for the NCAA, fell apart in Congress. But payment is something that some lawyers feel is a warranted right for these players, because many athletes are treated like employees.

For example, Cincinnati could even end the deal if Brendan Sorsby did not meet football-related requirements. He was also paid double during the season, but there was nothing when he stopped playing football. The QB also claimed that Cincinnati offered to ignore the $1 million if he chose to enter the 2026 NFL Draft instead of transferring. Sorsby also sees the sum as a “penalty” for transferring out.

Source link

You may also like